NORFOLK TEAM STATISTICS Through Games of 04/07/2002
No. PLAYER POS GP G A PTS +/- PIM PP SH GW GT FG OT UG SHOTS PCT
XArnason, Tyler C 60 26 30 56 -2 42 11 0 3 2 6 0 4 184 14.1
15 Henderson, Matt LW 74 21 28 49 4 90 7 1 4 1 5 0 1 194 10.8
29 Hankinson, Casey RW 72 19 30 49 1 85 6 2 2 0 6 0 0 172 11.0
32 Baines, Ajay C 80 16 28 44 11 70 5 4 4 0 2 1 1 138 11.6
5 Baumgartner, Nolan D 76 10 24 34 1 72 4 0 1 1 0 0 0 188 5.3
7 Souza, Mike LW 66 20 11 31 0 58 6 1 4 1 5 0 2 179 11.2
6 McCarthy, Steve D 77 7 21 28 -16 37 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 151 4.6
17 Peluso, Mike RW 29 18 9 27 3 4 6 0 3 0 0 0 1 98 18.4
9 Bowler, Bill C 28 3 16 19 -11 35 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 37 8.1
(TOTALS) C 45 5 21 26 -21 41 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 63 7.9
8 Campbell, Jim RW 44 11 14 25 6 26 5 0 3 0 3 1 1 117 9.4
23 Leroux, Jean-Yves LW 59 8 16 24 1 94 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 115 7.0
12 White, Peter C 24 4 19 23 7 18 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 37 10.8
55 Thornton, Shawn RW 70 8 14 22 -3 281 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 152 5.3
27 Laing, Quintin LW 61 6 15 21 -2 32 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 75 8.0
11 Jones, Ty RW 55 6 14 20 4 172 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 53 11.3
64 Tolkunov, Dmitri D 51 1 18 19 22 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 68 1.5
24 Zelepukin, Valeri LW 27 8 10 18 3 29 3 0 3 0 1 0 0 59 13.6
2 Huskins, Kent D 65 4 11 15 6 44 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 89 4.5
22 Fiddler, Vern C 38 8 5 13 -1 28 1 1 3 1 1 0 1 63 12.7
40 Ndur, Rumun D 52 4 9 13 5 133 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 44 9.1
XRussell, Bobby RW 61 5 7 12 -6 20 2 0 1 1 1 0 0 88 5.7
XDubinsky, Steve C 16 7 3 10 4 6 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 53 13.2
XChebaturkin, Vladimi D 57 2 8 10 8 78 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 3.4
33 Helperl, Jeff D 56 0 9 9 0 109 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 0.0
XMcAlpine, Chris D 8 0 4 4 -1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0.0
XDowney, Aaron RW 12 0 2 2 1 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0.0
31 Andersson, Craig G 28 0 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
XO'Brien, Steve D 1 0 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
3 Aitken, Johnathan D 28 0 1 1 -2 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0.0
49 Leighton, Michael G 52 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
XCarroll, Ken G 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
XApps, Syl C 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.0
XKowalsky, Rick RW 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
XDalmao, Duncan D 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
XPerrott, Nathan LW 2 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0.0
XPassmore, Steve G 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
XBogas, Chris D 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0.0
XGalbraith, Lance F 3 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0.0
BENCH 80 8
TOTALS 80 222 380 602 1686 64 10 38 8 45 2 15 2527 8.8
OPPONENT TOTALS 80 205 337 542 1652 60 5 30 4 35 4 12 2156 9.5
No. GPI MIN AVG W L T EN SO GA SAVES SPCT
49 Leighton, Michael 52 3114:13 2.14 27 16 8 4 6 111 1269 0.920
31 Andersson, Craig 28 1567:59 2.95 9 13 4 4 2 77 598 0.886
XPassmore, Steve 2 120:00 3.00 2 0 0 0 0 6 65 0.915
XCarroll, Ken 1 58:12 3.09 0 1 0 0 0 3 19 0.864
TEAM TOTALS 80 4874:51 2.52 38 30 12 8 8 205 1951 0.905
OPPONENT TOTALS 80 4874:51 2.73 30 38 12 9 4 222 2305 0.912
X - No longer on Team
Current Standings Through Games of 04/07/2002
EASTERN CONFERENCE
HOME ROAD LAST TEN STREAK
EAST GP W L T OTL PTS PCT GF GA PIM W- L- T W- L- T W- L- T W- L- T
Y-Bridgeport (1) 80 43 25 8 4 98 .613 240 192 1361 26-10- 4 17-19- 4 6- 3- 1 1- 0- 0
X-Hartford (4) 80 41 26 10 3 95 .594 249 243 1974 22-12- 6 19-17- 4 5- 5- 0 0- 1- 0
X-Providence (10)80 35 33 8 4 82 .513 190 223 1713 20-16- 4 15-21- 4 3- 7- 0 0- 3- 0
Springfield 80 35 41 2 2 74 .463 213 237 2052 23-17- 0 12-26- 2 4- 5- 1 2- 0- 1
Albany 80 14 42 12 12 52 .325 172 271 1238 11-23- 6 3-31- 6 2- 8- 0 1- 0- 0
NORTH
Y-Lowell (2) 80 41 25 11 3 96 .600 229 209 1311 19-15- 6 22-13- 5 7- 2- 1 1- 0- 0
X-Manchester (5) 80 38 28 11 3 90 .563 236 225 1491 23-14- 3 15-17- 8 5- 4- 1 2- 0- 0
X-Worcester (8) 80 39 33 7 1 86 .538 245 218 1945 22-15- 3 17-19- 4 5- 4- 1 1- 0- 0
Portland 80 30 31 15 4 79 .494 220 225 1767 21-16- 3 9-19-12 4- 6- 0 0- 1- 0
CANADIAN
Y-Quebec (3) 80 35 27 15 3 88 .550 257 254 1475 18-13- 9 17-17- 6 2- 6- 2 0- 3- 1
X-Hamilton (6) 80 37 30 10 3 87 .544 247 205 1664 23-11- 6 14-22- 4 5- 3- 2 2- 0- 1
X-St. John's (7) 80 34 27 17 2 87 .544 256 240 1554 19-13- 8 15-16- 9 5- 3- 2 3- 0- 1
X-Manitoba (9) 80 39 33 4 4 86 .538 270 260 1921 20-18- 2 19-19- 2 5- 4- 1 0- 2- 1
Saint John 80 29 34 13 4 75 .469 182 202 1347 15-15-10 14-23- 3 3- 5- 2 0- 3- 1
WESTERN CONFERENCE
WEST
Y-Grand Rapids(2) 80 42 27 11 0 95 .594 217 178 1335 24-12- 4 18-15- 7 5- 4- 1 3- 0- 0
X-Houston (4) 80 39 26 10 5 93 .581 234 232 1653 19-15- 6 20-16- 4 7- 2- 1 6- 0- 1
X-Utah (5) 80 40 29 6 5 91 .569 240 225 1777 21-16- 3 19-18- 3 3- 6- 1 0- 2- 0
X-Chicago (7) 80 37 31 7 5 86 .538 250 236 1695 19-17- 4 18-19- 3 4- 6- 0 0- 4- 0
Milwaukee 80 30 35 10 5 75 .469 198 207 1511 18-17- 5 12-23- 5 4- 5- 1 1- 0- 0
CENTRAL
Y-Syracuse (1) 80 39 23 13 5 96 .600 228 193 2058 22-11- 7 17-17- 6 7- 3- 0 0- 1- 0
X-Rochester (9) 80 32 30 15 3 82 .513 206 211 1896 18-16- 6 14-17- 9 5- 5- 0 0- 3- 0
X-Cincinnati (10)80 33 33 11 3 80 .500 216 211 1577 19-14- 7 14-22- 4 3- 5- 2 1- 0- 1
Cleveland 80 29 40 7 4 69 .431 223 268 2298 17-23- 0 12-21- 7 4- 5- 1 1- 0- 1
SOUTH
Y-Norfolk (3) 80 38 26 12 4 92 .575 222 205 1686 20-12- 8 18-18- 4 8- 2- 0 0- 1- 0
X-Hershey (6) 80 36 27 11 6 89 .556 200 193 1675 21-13- 6 15-20- 5 8- 2- 0 2- 0- 0
X-Philadelphia(8) 80 33 27 15 5 86 .538 206 210 2181 18-13- 9 15-19- 6 4- 5- 1 0- 1- 0
Wilkes-Barre 80 20 44 13 3 56 .350 201 274 2807 14-19- 7 6-28- 6 0- 9- 1 0- 9- 1
Note: Teams receive two points for each regulation or overtime victory, one point for each
game tied at the end of regulation.
Number in parentheses () indicates where team is seeded for Calder Cup Playoffs.
X-Clinched playoff berth Y-Clinched Division Title
Number
in parentheses ( ) indicates where team is seeded for Calder Cup
Playoffs. Within each Conference, the Division leaders are seeded 1
through 3, based on points. The remaining clubs, regardless of
division, are then seeded in point order. At the conclusion of the
regular season, the top 10 clubs from each conference qualify for the
post-season, with 7 vs. 10 and 8 vs. 9 in a best-of-three qualifying
round.
The
2002 Calder Cup Playoffs begin with the best-of-five Conference
Quarterfinals (1 vs. 8, 2 vs. 7, 3 vs. 6, 4 vs. 5). Regardless of the
qualifying games being played, the 3 through 6 seeds may begin play in
the Conference Quarterfinals. Following the Quarterfinals will be the
best-of-seven Conference Semifinals, the best-of-seven Conference
Finals and a best-of-seven Calder Cup 2002 Final.
Tie-breaker for seeding the clubs:
1. points
2. wins
3. head-to-head record
4. greater overall goal
differential
5. most total goals in the
head to head series
Be sure to check out
www.caldercup.com for all the latest news on the 2002 Calder Cup
Playoffs.
Click
here for 2000-2001 Final Season Stats
|
